That made me want to see if the contrast is actually as good as it seems. I came across this, which was interesting reading.

https://veroniiiica.com/paper-colors-and-low-vision/

Yeah, having gone through the accessibility work for my website, I've gain a new appreciation of the importance of the highest possible contrast.

Well, this is a new spam.

Would have been better if they hadn't reversed first and last names.  So, if your name was Johnny A. Smith, it opened by saying, "Hi, Smith!"

It purports to be a medical report for my relative, "B. Johnny A."

I can view his discharge summary by clicking a link.  Of course, I'm not clicking that link.

But, it's like, well, first they screwed up by mixing up first and last names.  Second, it would be a violation of privacy rights to send me someone else's medical report.

Then it gives me "your" medical test number.  So, who had the test?  Me or the supposed relative?

Then I should not delay getting medical assistance for my family.  So, we're back to my supposed relative again?

So many screw-ups in one spam message.

Personally, I like white better. I guess I haven't noticed the glare.

As to republishing the last book, I don't think you need to unless you want to. That doesn't seem like the kind of thing that will produce widespread reader unrest.

I use white for nonfiction and books with color photos.  Otherwise, I use cream. Same...glare.