I don't agree with your premise.
Some readers come from an analytical lens, some from an emotional lens. This depends on your genre, but every genre will have a mix, and many readers will be hybrids.
[respectful snippage]
But don't draw a hard line between logical and emotional readers. That line doesn't exist.
It would be a boring world if we all agreed on everything
I think everyone is a mixture of logic and emotion, and it's not always easy to separate one from the other. My most recent (unsuccessful) copyedit had the editor leaving long comments (occasionally in ALL CAPS) how stupid my characters were. Most editors, however, don't usually inject that much emotion into their edits. (In my experience. YMMV.)
For a beta reader, however, I don't expect them to go LOOKING for errors. Of course if you find one, it can throw you out of the story. But a reader goes looking for a good story and an editor goes looking for things that are incorrect.
My last paid beta reader started her first comment with, "You are starting the story in the wrong place. You need to start in medias res..."
To me, that ain't a beta read.
I had a beta reader tell me I needed to learn how to write and plan a story. That my story was terrible and she would never read another one of my books. Those were the positive points.
The odd thing was all through my draft she left comments loving my story. That was until she hit a turning point in my book. She then though the character was vapid and unredeemable.
Strong emotional feedback from an editor/beta anyone means they got emotionally invested in your book then you didn't meet their expectations. I certainly didn't.
What I did after that was go back and figure out what triggered the negative response. What expectations did I build that I didn't meet?
Since fixing that issue, I haven't gotten a single negative response. (other than my grammar stinks.. which is expected and what I hired an editor for)
I get that you paid for a copy editor and that wasn't what was provided, but as long as they provided the copy edit and their feedback for no additional charge I would try to use the added information to enhance your book.
That said not all feedback is helpful. I had two beta readers read another one of my books. One where a woman was physically abused. I don't write graphic violence against women in my book. We see enough of it in real life. I don't need to put those pictures in anyone else's heads.
Both readers said emphatically I needed to add the graphic violence. That it would make the story stronger. To me as an author it's not an option, and that is feedback I said thank you for providing and totally ignored.
As authors I think its a really important skill to learn how to evaluate feedback and determine what is and isn't helpful. We will get so much of it that we need to find a good way of turning the negatives into strengths not weakness.