31
Editors & Proofreaders [Public] / Re: I need a Proof/Beta Reader for my Christian Fantasy series - I can pay!
« Last post by Bill Hiatt on September 04, 2025, 09:46:50 PM »I've started moving toward shorter chapters as I've gone along, though initially I was thinking pages rather than words (which actually doesn't work as well in a word processor, unless the page size and margins are set up to mimic a paperback book.
Initially, I was going for a max of ten pages. If the earlier estimate (1200 words to a page) is correct, that would have been a max of 12,000, but since I was aiming more at an average of seven than hitting the max every time, that would have been 8400. More recently, I'm thinking that's perhaps too long.
When I started Substack serialization, the goal was to avoid having the post (which would usually be a chapter in a serial) get truncated in email (with a click-to-read-more at the end). Posts over over 6,000 words get into the danger zone, so that would be a functional maximum. Occasionally, posts would come close to that (usually the first part of a serial or the last). Most of the time, they'd be in the 1,000 to 3,000 range.
But as far as chapter breaks go, I follow the architectural maxim, "Form follows function." In other words, the chapter breaks must ultimately be determined by natural break points in the narrative, not forced into a length formula. If you're serializing or trying to keep people reading in a regular novel, it helps to end at a suspenseful point, so for me, that's one determiner of a break point. Since I've been writing with that in mind for some time, it's not hard to make that happen for a reasonable length chapter. It would be harder to take an preexisting piece and do that with it.
On the 42-chapter model, Post-Doctorate-D has a good point about not wanting to borgify things. However, the imitation of biblical structure in this case feels a lot like it's an author thing more than a reader thing--something an author will know is there but a reader will probably miss unless it's explicitly pointed out. There's nothing wrong with it being an author thing--unless enforcing it hinders the reader's experience.
I'll end on a funny story. One of my books has a Hitchc*ck moment--a brief appearance by me as a character. (Well, it's actually a shapeshifter pretending to be me, so I guess, only semi-Hitchc*ck.) The character is called Mr. H, teaches English at the high school where I used to teach--and where the scene is set--and matches my physical description. A number of people who knew me read that book and missed that entirely. Even people who read my bio might have at least wondered about it, but as far as I can tell, no one did. It tickled me but was lost on my audience completely.
Initially, I was going for a max of ten pages. If the earlier estimate (1200 words to a page) is correct, that would have been a max of 12,000, but since I was aiming more at an average of seven than hitting the max every time, that would have been 8400. More recently, I'm thinking that's perhaps too long.
When I started Substack serialization, the goal was to avoid having the post (which would usually be a chapter in a serial) get truncated in email (with a click-to-read-more at the end). Posts over over 6,000 words get into the danger zone, so that would be a functional maximum. Occasionally, posts would come close to that (usually the first part of a serial or the last). Most of the time, they'd be in the 1,000 to 3,000 range.
But as far as chapter breaks go, I follow the architectural maxim, "Form follows function." In other words, the chapter breaks must ultimately be determined by natural break points in the narrative, not forced into a length formula. If you're serializing or trying to keep people reading in a regular novel, it helps to end at a suspenseful point, so for me, that's one determiner of a break point. Since I've been writing with that in mind for some time, it's not hard to make that happen for a reasonable length chapter. It would be harder to take an preexisting piece and do that with it.
On the 42-chapter model, Post-Doctorate-D has a good point about not wanting to borgify things. However, the imitation of biblical structure in this case feels a lot like it's an author thing more than a reader thing--something an author will know is there but a reader will probably miss unless it's explicitly pointed out. There's nothing wrong with it being an author thing--unless enforcing it hinders the reader's experience.
I'll end on a funny story. One of my books has a Hitchc*ck moment--a brief appearance by me as a character. (Well, it's actually a shapeshifter pretending to be me, so I guess, only semi-Hitchc*ck.) The character is called Mr. H, teaches English at the high school where I used to teach--and where the scene is set--and matches my physical description. A number of people who knew me read that book and missed that entirely. Even people who read my bio might have at least wondered about it, but as far as I can tell, no one did. It tickled me but was lost on my audience completely.

Recent Posts