Author Topic: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference  (Read 571 times)

Eugene Lloyd MacRae

  • Ready Player One
  • Epic Novel unlocked
  • ****
  • Posts: 1049
  • Thanked: 80 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Taking the world by storm - one story at a time.
    • The Writtings of Eugene Lloyd MacRae
 
The following users thanked this post: emory, KFaitour, Nathan Haines, DeeMonster, heyb

Gerri Attrick

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2018, 04:41:46 AM »
Aarggh! Video alert! Video alert!

Actually, I will watch this. Iíve read Deanís book by the same name and enjoyed it, even if, by and large, the method ainít for me.
 
The following users thanked this post: Nathan Haines

Eugene Lloyd MacRae

  • Ready Player One
  • Epic Novel unlocked
  • ****
  • Posts: 1049
  • Thanked: 80 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Taking the world by storm - one story at a time.
    • The Writtings of Eugene Lloyd MacRae
Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2018, 06:31:04 AM »
Aarggh! Video alert! Video alert!

Actually, I will watch this. Iíve read Deanís book by the same name and enjoyed it, even if, by and large, the method ainít for me.
Funny how different things work for different people - I have over 50 books now between my own & a pen name since I started this method in the spring of 2012. And itís the only method that works for me - I get bored with an outline when it comes to fiction. So do my cats - they tell me to stop it.
 

heyb

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2018, 06:34:44 AM »
Brilliant. Thanks for posting this. I agree with him. Loved the salty questioners at the end too, would have been great to see a lengthier Q & A with Dean for sure. He ended it just when it was getting good.
 

munboy

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2018, 06:36:30 AM »
There are a lot of problems using his method will cause, especially for new writers. But I guess if it works for, then that's great.
 

LilyBLily

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2018, 08:45:58 AM »
Now I understand what he means by "writing into the dark." It's what I do. The joy of discovery as the story unfolds is the reason I'm willing to keep writing. If I knew what would come next, I'd be bored, and so would a reader. Cycling back to fix stuff after I've had a new idea is usually what I do once I reach the end, but I can see how doing it daily warms him up to keep on with the story and smooths out what has gone before. 
 

She-la-te-da

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2018, 11:47:15 PM »
There are a lot of problems using his method will cause, especially for new writers. But I guess if it works for, then that's great.

Like what? Because from what I read from all sorts of writers, every method has problems for someone. No one has said everyone has to do this, but it works for many of us. I've tried and tried to outline, and it causes a lot of problems for me. My feeling is, people should try any kind of way to write, find what works for them, and then be allowed to do it without people telling them it's wrong or it's going to ruin their writing, or whatever. It's sort of the same pointless argument about "fast" writing vs "slow" writing.
I write various flavors of speculative fiction. This is my main pen name.

 

sandree

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2018, 05:54:28 AM »
Thanks for the video - I donít like videos either but this one was worth watching. This is pretty much how Iím writing, though Iím doing a lot more editing - my first novel and I had a steep learning curve so I needed to go back over the whole thing several times. But in principle, I think this method is what works best for me. It was nice to hear that validated and I like the idea of scribbling an outline after writing a chunk of it... Not sure I will ever get to the point of no rewrites but otherwise - great!
 

munboy

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2018, 08:14:22 AM »
There are a lot of problems using his method will cause, especially for new writers. But I guess if it works for, then that's great.

Like what? Because from what I read from all sorts of writers, every method has problems for someone. No one has said everyone has to do this, but it works for many of us. I've tried and tried to outline, and it causes a lot of problems for me. My feeling is, people should try any kind of way to write, find what works for them, and then be allowed to do it without people telling them it's wrong or it's going to ruin their writing, or whatever. It's sort of the same pointless argument about "fast" writing vs "slow" writing.

Of course there's no perfect writing method because everybody works differently. But, the big suggest that stood out to me that I completely disagree with is "write the perfect first draft". For beginning writers, that's a huge trap to fall into. They could spend years writing and rewriting and rewriting the first part of their book and never actually finish. The best thing for a new writer to do is actually finish a book. If you've been writing for 30 years like him, that is a workable method, but I would never suggest a new writer to write a perfect first draft. I've only been writing to publish for 3 years but I've met a lot of beginning writers at cons who tell me they never finish anything because it's never good enough. I fell into that trap when I was writing the first book I intended to publish. It took me nearly 3 years to finish because i was never happy with it. I kept going back and rewriting the first quarter of the book over and over. It wasn't until I finished the first draft that everything became clearer. A light switched on and a few revisions cleaned up the book to the point I felt good enough to invest my own money into publishing it.

On that same idea, another thing he said that rubbed me the wrong way is to write that first draft, put it out there and forget about it because he doesn't care about them. That just...baffles me. It tells me he writes to make money and for no other reason. I write for the creative process and I want to put the best possible product that my skills allow out into the world. It usually takes a revision or two to fill in plot holes, build characters, foreshadow, and other things that really round out a story.

To be honest, I couldn't watch the whole thing. It just seemed like one person's rant against traditional publishing.  :dizzy
 

angelapepper

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2018, 08:34:29 AM »
The part about creating a reverse outline as you go is very sensible.

His method is not for me, but I may recommend his book to some of the people I know who have a hard time finishing books.

At a recent local meeting of writers, we shared our Meyers Briggs types, and it was hilarious how evenly we were divided, and how similar the approaches of people with the same types were. No wonder there is no single approach that works for everyone!

I loved what he said about not writing to the outline and not doing the rewrites and nobody noticing. LOL. I believe it. When I hear about people doing major rewrites on books at their agent's request and then not selling the book... ugh!
 

sandree

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2018, 09:26:13 AM »
Do you remember the breakdown of the Meyers Briggs types and writing styles? I would be interested in hearing about that. Iím an INFJ, I think - anyway - one of the less common types. I definitely write (and live) in a more intuitive way - so pantsing makes sense...
 

LilyBLily

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #11 on: December 08, 2018, 09:29:42 AM »
The part about creating a reverse outline as you go is very sensible.

His method is not for me, but I may recommend his book to some of the people I know who have a hard time finishing books.

At a recent local meeting of writers, we shared our Meyers Briggs types, and it was hilarious how evenly we were divided, and how similar the approaches of people with the same types were. No wonder there is no single approach that works for everyone!

I loved what he said about not writing to the outline and not doing the rewrites and nobody noticing. LOL. I believe it. When I hear about people doing major rewrites on books at their agent's request and then not selling the book... ugh!

Having been on the other side of that game as an editor, I might as well tell you that editors do notice when the changes haven't been made, just as we notice when the queries aren't answered. Editors are practical, though. We do our best to point you in the right direction to save yourself from embarrassment, but there comes a moment when an editor has to bag it and let the book stand or fall on whatever merit it has. Nobody reads a book and says, "The editor should have stopped the author from killing off that character," or whatever. The blame for substantive issues falls on the author. Typos can always be blamed on proofreaders, but malapropisms are the author's fault most of the time, too. If an author cannot be bothered to make a complete effort to produce the best quality product s/he possibly can, it's going to hurt the author and no one else.

I also think writing a book and forgetting it instantly is another way of saying you don't care about the story or the reader in the slightest. The authors whom readers love tend to bleed on the page, maybe a little, maybe a lot. They don't--okay, I won't go scatological. But you get the idea.

 
The following users thanked this post: sandree

123mlh

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #12 on: December 08, 2018, 10:55:21 AM »
Do you remember the breakdown of the Meyers Briggs types and writing styles? I would be interested in hearing about that. Iím an INFJ, I think - anyway - one of the less common types. I definitely write (and live) in a more intuitive way - so pantsing makes sense...

If you're interested in exploring how Meyers Briggs type impacts writing, editing, etc. then I'd highly recommend Becca Syme's Write Better-Faster class: https://app.ruzuku.com/courses/30186/about

It uses Meyers-Briggs and DISC to give advice on all aspects of writing. It was eye-opening for me. (And in that class when I took it about 80% of us were either INFP or INFJ. It seems to be a common type for writers.)
 
The following users thanked this post: KFaitour, angelapepper

angelapepper

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #13 on: December 08, 2018, 11:21:32 AM »
Do you remember the breakdown of the Meyers Briggs types and writing styles? I would be interested in hearing about that. Iím an INFJ, I think - anyway - one of the less common types. I definitely write (and live) in a more intuitive way - so pantsing makes sense...

Teehee! I do know how the types break down, but I didn't dare say it, lest I trigger the usual outrage of pantsers vs outliners.

INFJ is extremely common in groups of writers, unlike in the regular population. That's what I am, so it's practically a cliche that I'm a writer. My husband is INTJ, like the majority of sci-fi/fantasy writers.

I can write however I decide to write, so I'm a flexitarian. :-)  I think the real downfall of writers is when they don't do the 1-2 things that deep down they know they should be doing to augment their personal writing style. Whenever I talk to people who aren't meeting their goals, they know exactly why it isn't coming together.

There's a good book on Amazon about the INFJ writer that I've read a few times. It covers a couple of similar types as well.
ETA LINK: https://www.amazon.com/INFJ-Writer-Cracking-Creative-Genius-ebook/dp/B01FG8TQIW/
« Last Edit: December 08, 2018, 11:44:23 AM by angelapepper »
 
The following users thanked this post: KFaitour, sandree

sandree

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #14 on: December 08, 2018, 11:35:49 AM »
Cool! I bought the Amazon book - sounds fascinating...
 
The following users thanked this post: angelapepper

heyb

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #15 on: December 08, 2018, 12:47:19 PM »
Do you remember the breakdown of the Meyers Briggs types and writing styles? I would be interested in hearing about that. Iím an INFJ, I think - anyway - one of the less common types. I definitely write (and live) in a more intuitive way - so pantsing makes sense...

Teehee! I do know how the types break down, but I didn't dare say it, lest I trigger the usual outrage of pantsers vs outliners.

INFJ is extremely common in groups of writers, unlike in the regular population. That's what I am, so it's practically a cliche that I'm a writer. My husband is INTJ, like the majority of sci-fi/fantasy writers.

I can write however I decide to write, so I'm a flexitarian. :-)  I think the real downfall of writers is when they don't do the 1-2 things that deep down they know they should be doing to augment their personal writing style. Whenever I talk to people who aren't meeting their goals, they know exactly why it isn't coming together.

There's a good book on Amazon about the INFJ writer that I've read a few times. It covers a couple of similar types as well.
ETA LINK: https://www.amazon.com/INFJ-Writer-Cracking-Creative-Genius-ebook/dp/B01FG8TQIW/

I'm INFP, is there a particular genre that type usually writes that you're aware of? You've got me curious.
 

Tom Wood

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #16 on: December 08, 2018, 01:10:35 PM »
Meyers Briggs
Astrology
I Ching
Feng Shui
Tarot
Religion

IMO, the value of these thought systems is based in an attempt to create an approach to the irrational with a mindful attitude. I think that the initial concept was to create a structured method that could be used to de-focus the rational mind and consider other possibilities. I think they are all attempts to induce intuitive thinking by bringing into focus a particular point of view. None of them have predictive abilities, IMO.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2018, 01:13:04 PM by Tom Wood »
 

angelapepper

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #17 on: December 08, 2018, 02:08:19 PM »
I'm INFP, is there a particular genre that type usually writes that you're aware of? You've got me curious.

I'm sure that genre varies a lot by person, but the common theme I see is they have to believe strongly in a project to see it through. They might not be as oriented to writing to market as other types.

These are broad strokes, YMMV. I know a few ladies who are INFP, and they like writing literary women's fiction.

We could do some sort of survey here!

MB Type: INFJ
Genre: Mystery
Writing Method: Outline, 2 drafts
Annual novel output: 6
« Last Edit: December 08, 2018, 02:11:16 PM by angelapepper »
 

Jeff Tanyard

  • Epic Novel unlocked
  • ****
  • Posts: 1196
  • Thanked: 304 times
  • Gender: Male
  • It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.
    • My Blog
Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #18 on: December 08, 2018, 02:48:48 PM »

We could do some sort of survey here!

MB Type: INFJ
Genre: Mystery
Writing Method: Outline, 2 drafts
Annual novel output: 6


INTJ here, according to the 16personalities website's test. 

Genre:  I write science fiction, but my first love is fantasy.
Method:  Outlining.  More like a detailed synopsis, actually.  Three drafts and a proofreading pass.
Output:  About 1.5 novels per year, I guess.  (Started outlining the trilogy in the fall of 2014, and I'll be publishing the third book of the current series before long.)  I hate the slowness of my pace.  I can write the first draft fairly fast.  It's the rest that takes forever.
v  v  v  v  v  v    Short Stories    v  v  v  v  v  v       Anthology       vvv FREE! vvv
        
Genres: Science Fiction, Fantasy (some day) | Author Website
 

heyb

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #19 on: December 08, 2018, 07:43:58 PM »
Meyers Briggs
Astrology
I Ching
Feng Shui
Tarot
Religion

IMO, the value of these thought systems is based in an attempt to create an approach to the irrational with a mindful attitude. I think that the initial concept was to create a structured method that could be used to de-focus the rational mind and consider other possibilities. I think they are all attempts to induce intuitive thinking by bringing into focus a particular point of view. None of them have predictive abilities, IMO.

Yeah, but some of that stuff is fun. I don't take it too seriously, I just find it interesting to think about and play around with.

I'm INFP, is there a particular genre that type usually writes that you're aware of? You've got me curious.

I'm sure that genre varies a lot by person, but the common theme I see is they have to believe strongly in a project to see it through. They might not be as oriented to writing to market as other types.

These are broad strokes, YMMV. I know a few ladies who are INFP, and they like writing literary women's fiction.

We could do some sort of survey here!

MB Type: INFJ
Genre: Mystery
Writing Method: Outline, 2 drafts
Annual novel output: 6

Cool, I'll play...

MB Type: INFP
Genre: Crime, Adventure, Parody, and Post-Apoc
Method: Outline, 1 draft
Annual novel output: 6
 

TimothyEllis

  • Forum Owner
  • Administrator
  • Epic Novel unlocked
  • ******
  • Posts: 1315
  • Thanked: 527 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Earth Galaxy somewhere, 2618
    • The Hunter Legacy Universe
Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #20 on: December 08, 2018, 08:50:58 PM »
Of course there's no perfect writing method because everybody works differently. But, the big suggest that stood out to me that I completely disagree with is "write the perfect first draft". For beginning writers, that's a huge trap to fall into. They could spend years writing and rewriting and rewriting the first part of their book and never actually finish.

That isn't what that means.

Pantsing is about writing forwards all the time.

Writing the perfect first draft means you dont write a draft at all. You write a book. Its not a draft, because it is already perfect.

There is no rewriting, and rewriting, and rewriting. There is writing the book, then editing the book, then proofreading the book, and then launch. Nothing gets rewritten, and there are no years involved.

I would have said "Write a book in only one pass, edit it, proof it, and get it out there." That's what "write the perfect first draft" means. Using the word 'draft' at all is where people misinterpret the meaning.

Pantsers dont draft, we write books without looking back, then polish them when complete.

 
The following users thanked this post: djmills

sandree

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #21 on: December 08, 2018, 11:20:39 PM »
INFP-A now - according to the 16personalities website's test. I think when I took it years ago, it came up INFJ

Genre:  science fiction now, possibly fantasy in the future
Method:  Mostly pantsing, very intuitive - similar to writing into the dark except for more editing passes. This could change - Iím a newb.
Output:  just finishing my first novel - took about a year?
 

sandree

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #22 on: December 08, 2018, 11:32:00 PM »
I guess it depends on how you define rewriting and editing. In the video, it sounded like he never went back for an editing pass after the whole first draft was completed. This seems like something only an experienced writer can do. As a new writer, my learning curve was so steep, that I had to go back and bring the beginning of the book up to the standards of the later chapters - and do a lot of patching and reworking to get it all to hang together. Is that rewriting or editing? Not sure.

Maybe it doesnít matter - I get the general message of moving forward with the writing and writing into the dark. Both of those ideas make sense. Some of us might not be skilled enough in the craft not to do some heavy editing passes before it goes out into the world.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2018, 11:35:02 PM by sandree »
 

JRTomlin

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #23 on: December 09, 2018, 01:06:55 AM »
There are a lot of problems using his method will cause, especially for new writers. But I guess if it works for, then that's great.

Like what? Because from what I read from all sorts of writers, every method has problems for someone. No one has said everyone has to do this, but it works for many of us. I've tried and tried to outline, and it causes a lot of problems for me. My feeling is, people should try any kind of way to write, find what works for them, and then be allowed to do it without people telling them it's wrong or it's going to ruin their writing, or whatever. It's sort of the same pointless argument about "fast" writing vs "slow" writing.

Of course there's no perfect writing method because everybody works differently. But, the big suggest that stood out to me that I completely disagree with is "write the perfect first draft". For beginning writers, that's a huge trap to fall into. They could spend years writing and rewriting and rewriting the first part of their book and never actually finish. The best thing for a new writer to do is actually finish a book. If you've been writing for 30 years like him, that is a workable method, but I would never suggest a new writer to write a perfect first draft. I've only been writing to publish for 3 years but I've met a lot of beginning writers at cons who tell me they never finish anything because it's never good enough. I fell into that trap when I was writing the first book I intended to publish. It took me nearly 3 years to finish because i was never happy with it. I kept going back and rewriting the first quarter of the book over and over. It wasn't until I finished the first draft that everything became clearer. A light switched on and a few revisions cleaned up the book to the point I felt good enough to invest my own money into publishing it.

On that same idea, another thing he said that rubbed me the wrong way is to write that first draft, put it out there and forget about it because he doesn't care about them. That just...baffles me. It tells me he writes to make money and for no other reason. I write for the creative process and I want to put the best possible product that my skills allow out into the world. It usually takes a revision or two to fill in plot holes, build characters, foreshadow, and other things that really round out a story.

To be honest, I couldn't watch the whole thing. It just seemed like one person's rant against traditional publishing.  :dizzy
Except he says NOT to rewrite. If you are re-writing, it is no longer a first draft. And no he does not say he does not care about the 'creative process." The Creative Process was writing it in the first place.

99% of that re-writing you think people should do is nothing but nit picking that does nothing to improve the novel. I can build characters, foreshadow and round out the story the first time through. It means actually thinking about you are writing, not just vomiting onto the page, I admit. It means I sweat over that 'first draft', but my idea of hell is nit picking over a novel for months. I find nothing 'creative' about that.

YMMV
 

Eugene Lloyd MacRae

  • Ready Player One
  • Epic Novel unlocked
  • ****
  • Posts: 1049
  • Thanked: 80 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Taking the world by storm - one story at a time.
    • The Writtings of Eugene Lloyd MacRae
Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #24 on: December 09, 2018, 06:01:30 AM »
I guess it depends on how you define rewriting and editing. In the video, it sounded like he never went back for an editing pass after the whole first draft was completed. This seems like something only an experienced writer can do. As a new writer, my learning curve was so steep, that I had to go back and bring the beginning of the book up to the standards of the later chapters - and do a lot of patching and reworking to get it all to hang together. Is that rewriting or editing? Not sure.

Maybe it doesnít matter - I get the general message of moving forward with the writing and writing into the dark. Both of those ideas make sense. Some of us might not be skilled enough in the craft not to do some heavy editing passes before it goes out into the world.

Dean Wesley Smith does 'edit'. He uses a term called cycling -as he writes- and it's one that I use. Besides typos or grammatical errors, when I go back through on my cycling I look to see if I've added in (or need) one of the five senses to ground the reader. That's just one of the things I have to be conscious of making sure I have in my stories.

He can explain it in his own words at

https://www.deanwesleysmith.com/you-can-learn-story-from-the-hg-network/

https://www.deanwesleysmith.com/heinleins-rules-chapter-six/


I can understand what you mean about the learning curve but don't let that discourage you. When I did my first couple of books I realized I had too much packed into thick paragraphs and had to go back and split the words into action-reaction sequences that made it much easier to read and made more sense.  Just keep learning and writing stories.
 :tup3b
 
The following users thanked this post: djmills, sandree

CoraBuhlert

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #25 on: December 09, 2018, 11:29:40 AM »
Okay, I'll play:

Type: INFP
Genres: Science fiction, mystery/crime fiction, fantasy, romance, adventure
Method: No outline, two drafts
Output: approx. 2 novels plus 10 to 12 shorter stories published, more written

Blog | Pegasus Pulp | Newsletter | Author Central | Twitter | Instagram
Genres: All of them, but mostly science fiction and mystery/crime
 

Hopscotch

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #26 on: December 10, 2018, 01:40:11 AM »
Pantsers dont draft, we write books without looking back, then polish them when complete.

I suppose I take that to the extreme - I write to edit.  I write in a frenzy to get those ideas out of my head, then wallow in happy editing shaping the story.  30 books in 7 years and lots of fun along the way.  Grabbing process ideas from more successful writers is useful, but what works for you, works.
 

She-la-te-da

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #27 on: December 10, 2018, 02:39:16 AM »
Of course there's no perfect writing method because everybody works differently. But, the big suggest that stood out to me that I completely disagree with is "write the perfect first draft". For beginning writers, that's a huge trap to fall into. They could spend years writing and rewriting and rewriting the first part of their book and never actually finish.

That isn't what that means.

Pantsing is about writing forwards all the time.

Writing the perfect first draft means you dont write a draft at all. You write a book. Its not a draft, because it is already perfect.

There is no rewriting, and rewriting, and rewriting. There is writing the book, then editing the book, then proofreading the book, and then launch. Nothing gets rewritten, and there are no years involved.

I would have said "Write a book in only one pass, edit it, proof it, and get it out there." That's what "write the perfect first draft" means. Using the word 'draft' at all is where people misinterpret the meaning.

Pantsers dont draft, we write books without looking back, then polish them when complete.



Exactly, Timothy. People misunderstand what DWS does all the time (sometimes to the point that I think some are deliberately not getting it. Like any other "rule" about writing, he's shortened it down to the basics, and he doesn't go into the details all the time. People who want to learn to do it this way must take the time to learn the craft and get to the point they aren't agonizing over every word or scene. Once it becomes a learned skill, like muscle memory, you're able to simply sit down and write.

Quote
I also think writing a book and forgetting it instantly is another way of saying you don't care about the story or the reader in the slightest.

Not what he or any of us who write the same way mean it. What DWS is trying to do is stop people from endlessly "polishing" their books, and worrying over the book once it's out there is another way some writers can't move forward. When I'm working on a book, it's very important. I edit as I go (cycling), do one draft, format and publish. Do I miss things? Sure. But I guarantee you, look at any book, no matter how many times it's been drafted, edited, rewritten, proofread and on and on, and there will be mistakes.

Look this won't work for every writer. No one says it will. But it works for those of us who understand the method and put our creative mind in the driver's seat at all times. I've been writing this way for longer than DWS, it was the way I taught myself to write by the time I was nine or ten, so 50 years. Once I started finding books on how to write, I realized it wasn't how others crafted their stories, but it worked for me then, and it works for me now.

My advice to all writers:  you do you, and let others do what works for them. No one way is right or wrong, just different, as we are all different. Stop trying to scare off new writers by telling them there will be all sorts of horrors awaiting if they go off the outline and edit multiple times track, because it isn't necessarily so.
I write various flavors of speculative fiction. This is my main pen name.

 

angelapepper

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #28 on: December 10, 2018, 04:04:02 AM »
It's good to note that when a person is writing their first book, they don't know what method is going to work best for them. If they pants it, and can't finish the book, it would be good to give outlining a shot. If they outline and then get too bored to finish, then toss the outline and give pantsing a shot.

For experienced writers, it's different. Perhaps the most maddening thing is that even when you're writing in the best method (for you), you might experience normal creative uncertainy, especially if your personality makes you more self-critical and doubting, and you might feel like you're using the wrong method when you probably aren't. That's why we're all so interested in how other people write.

We're always looking for that "one weird trick" that'll get us writing 5k+ a day of high-quality work that will sell, with a big smile on our faces. As far as I can tell, exactly 12 people have figured that out. LOL.
 
The following users thanked this post: heyb

dgcasey

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #29 on: December 10, 2018, 04:14:02 AM »
It's good to note that when a person is writing their first book, they don't know what method is going to work best for them. If they pants it, and can't finish the book, it would be good to give outlining a shot. If they outline and then get too bored to finish, then toss the outline and give pantsing a shot.

I do kind of a mix of the two. I'll use my timeline program to map out the story, which serves as my outline. I'll refer to it as I get started with the writing, but by the time I'm hitting the halfway point, I don't look at it too much. I figure by that point I know where the story is going and I just go with it, sometimes taking some wild detours along the way. Some writers can start a story, without any idea as to where it is going, but I need to have a rough idea. If I jump into my car to drive to Yellowstone and I have three weeks to get there, I know where I'm going, but I'm probably going to take some side roads to get there.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2018, 07:20:36 AM by dgcasey »
All available at Amazon, some available at B&N and some available God knows where
Dave's Amazon Author page | DGlennCasey.com | TheDailyPainter.com
 

angelapepper

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #30 on: December 10, 2018, 05:07:56 AM »

I do kind of a mix of the two. I'll use my timeline program to map out the story, which serve as my outline. I'll refer to it as I get started with the writing, but by the time I'm hitting the halfway point, I don't look at it too much. I figure by that point I know where the story is going and I just go with it, sometimes taking some wild detours along the way. Some writers can start a story, without any idea as to where it is going, but I need to have a rough idea. If I jump into my car to drive to Yellowstone and I have three weeks to get there, I know where I'm going, but I'm probably going to take some side roads to get there.

A mix is great! I used to feel like whenever I veered off the outline and wrote a different ending it was a waste of time to write the outline, but now I see that it was just one path explored so I could then take a better path.

These days, my outlines are better, so I tend to stick to them. I think my early days outlines just weren't as good / worth following.

Outlining makes more sense later in a series, too, when you have already explored and developed the main characters a great deal. I can plan for them while leaving subplots and side characters more open.
 

CoraBuhlert

Re: Writing Into The Dark - Dean Wesley Smith - 20Books Vegas Conference
« Reply #31 on: December 11, 2018, 01:39:14 PM »
That YouTube channel has a lot more videos from the 20Booksto50K Vegas conference BTW. Lots of interesting stuff there and cheaper than attending the actual conference.

Blog | Pegasus Pulp | Newsletter | Author Central | Twitter | Instagram
Genres: All of them, but mostly science fiction and mystery/crime
 
The following users thanked this post: KFaitour, dgcasey, alyson